The death of Aaron Swartz is a sobering moment in the journey towards open access to the research literature. It brings sharply into perspective much of the ‘debate’ which, frankly, focuses on trivial issues of detail.
In response, many are taking the step of making their own publications freely available, using the #pdftribute tag on twitter. Imagine if everyone did this.
The power for change lies with the research community. No journal could survive if researchers stopped submitting papers or reviewing the papers of their peers, and the channels exist to bypass journals completely if necessary. Sufficient collective action can make the change.
The death of Aaron Swartz is a tragedy apparently precipitated by demons internal and external. While truly a time to reflect on one’s own life, family, work and beliefs, using this sad news for as a blunt instrument for political gain (as some are doing) seems inappropriate. Finding a meaningful response and taking considered steps forward as an individual or a community of the same takes more than a short-lived tribute. If people really wish to honour this man, his well-accounted drive and spirit, I’d suggest looking to emulate his work ethic in one’s own way, in one’s own field – and, critically, avoid the kinds of quick, cheap answers that do not last. Creating a better future takes hard work, and so each person need to muck in to achieve it.